Many
cities around the world are engulfed in smog today, smog which can
potentially build up to hazardous levels for human health. When faced
with this hindrance to a healthy life, the city dwellers could
abandon their daily activities as governed by the state and other
authorities, and instead take to the streets in protest against the
polluting of the environment. We do not know how many protests
there have been which have been obscured by the smog, but these
invisible protests pose a significant problem for authorities, who
cannot deal with them or make the protesters visible for discipline.
These protests may thus gain in much strength and numbers before
authorities are able to see them and stop them.
The
link between burning items and the act of protesting is strong: in
Kathmandu for instance protesters have always sought to burn things
like tires and cars in the course of their protest. A deep and
threatening kind of politicization is evident today if we consider that
industries and factories are deliberately polluting the city's
streets in order to show their own disappointment and rebellion
against governmental authorities. Whereas burning of cars and tires
had been a sign of local and strategic control of certain streets or
locations over others, the blanket of smog that engulfs the vast,
whole city is evidence of a much more powerful group of people, with
their associated industries, systematically protesting against the
authorities. Also, this “smog protest” could finally signal an
end to a kind of capitalism without social responsibility, and the
beginning of a problematizing of the industries by the industrialists
themselves. Only the governmental authorities are, in the end,
reluctant to give up the capitalist model, regardless of the smog
levels, and when the time comes these governmental authorities will
enforce the model by themselves regardless of the feelings of certain
industrialists.
We
know that these same cities conduct the discussions of the ethics of
“chemical weapons,” and we should wonder what the difference is
between this hazardous smog and a chemical weapon. We have to
ask why there has not been the identification of a culprit for this
smog, some particular industry could be at fault but has not been
identified, in much the same way that users of chemical weapons try
to hide from the general public, and this correlation between smog
emitters and chemical weapons users shows that smog emission is a “amoral
and bad” thing, just as chemical weapons are. Further, whereas a
chemical weapon as we conventionally understand it is used in smaller
amounts and durations, smog is a weapon which is not directly
controlled by the industrialists, but can arise at any moment,
unpredictably, at times of peace or war, and without much that can be
done to prevent it. This loss of control over a weapon-like substance
is more threatening to world order than the weapons which are under
control of the authorities. Hence it is now very important to find out the intentions and responses of the industrialists to the smog.