Leaders from Brazil,
India, China and South Africa (in short: the BRICS nations) meet regularly,
cooperating with one another because their countries are claimed by the news to
represent the economic and geopolitical powerhouses of the future.
But the BRICS's economic performance and sociopolitical climate are
far from steady to make the “powerhouse” label justified. Rather, the
significance of “the BRICS arc” lies in the
international news media "big business." This international news media big business has divided into continental
offices and thus needs a nation to play the role of “leading
continental powerhouse” to serve as the main character for their news-stories in a specific continent. China and India
play the “powerhouse” characters in “Asia-Pacific,” while
Brazil plays the same character for South America as South Africa
does so for the African continent. A standardized and model
narrative is in display for each
continent, with the use of the “one core power per continent”
story-line. If the specific proper names of BRICS
countries are removed, the broadcast news in the “Asia-Pacific”
region will resemble that in “Africa” or elsewhere to a great
degree because of a kind of standard news template having been
utilized by each continental office. Nations
such as Nepal are not regular fixtures within international news
channels, and so do not have roles to play, but for nations that are
a regular fixture, there needs to be an arc or story in which
they are placed as characters so that they can attract loyal viewers on a
day-to-day basis.
The aesthetic orderliness of this simple idea of the
one-powerhouse-per-continent arc makes it seem that the
international news media shapes geopolitics in a way that makes the
world seem pleasing to the audience: the goal of news being shaping
geopolitics to make the news attractive, rather than relying on undramatic information-spreading. Also, the audience's demands for more relevant
news-stories encourages
the news media to build the story that each continent has its own
powerhouse, a powerhouse which that whole continent can relate to and
like or dislike. American power is in decline not only because of
geopolitical tensions, but rather also because "America-as-sole-superpower" arc is no longer attractive for audiences of the
international news media channels. The audiences have moved to
appreciating a new kind of news-story, one where a regional nation
takes up the role of regional powerhouse.
As
so much of the news media's production relies on international
relations, it follows that the news media are more invested in
orienting international relations a certain way, in other words, the
news media is not just invested in observing
foreign nations, but rather is invested in actively
monitoring and shaping the
stories that emerge from foreign nations. The
news media shapes geopolitics from behind-the-scenes in this way
because it is good for business: it can expand its viewership and operate its
offices in “Asia-Pacific” or “South America” if it can
produce news that will keep South American viewers tuned in in South
America and the African viewers tuned in in Africa and so on.
No comments:
Post a Comment