A
particular type of document is circulating today, making its
impact felt far and wide, but strictly within the office. This document, like most documents these
days, starts from the office, which is effectively a factory of and for documents. The office is a dominant mode of socializing subjects, and it manages subjects through the circulation of
documents. It is the contact with the document, the document-body
contact, which is all important. This document we are analyzing is
known as 'the report' in general language. Its format, like the format
of most documents these days, is flexible, which means that we cannot
say much in the way of definition about the report. Rather, it is
mostly defined for what it is supposed to do rather than what it is,
that is, it is defined in terms of its objectives and goals. This is
where we face a problem: the report's given objectives are to
facilitate openness and accountability, and in this sense the report
is supposedly something dedicated to the public sphere. When one
writes a report, it is supposed to clarify one's actions for the
general public; it can be accessed by the public, supposedly; it is meant for a presentation to the public. But, in
actual fact, the purpose of the report is totally for the private
sphere, the report's objective is to facilitate a particular type of
enclosure of the office's subjects, from the lowly writer of the
report to the boss who reads it. This is an enclosure/imprisonment of
all the points along a hierarchy, in a sense, it is the imprisonment
of the boss itself within the logic of privacy. With the printer and the computer, we have managed to create the conditions for our own perpetual imprisonment, for the stream of documents is endless...This, however, is a special type of imprisonment. It is not the imprisonment where all prisoners are equal, as in a jail. But it is a hierarchical imprisonment...Additionally, the report has
been arranged in its relation to human subjects in such a way that
any agency with regards to the document is purely stylistic and not
substantive. This is so because the writer of the report is so lowly
as to not know the exact workings of the office, so he/she offers up
stylistic points for the report. At the other end, the boss is so
high up and concentrated upon his/her goals as to offer the report
something which cannot be accurately understood by the other workers,
in other words, stylistic points only. So, we begin to see how the
report is not really a document full of content that relates the
office to the public sphere, but rather, it distorts the office in
the eyes of the public completely. Most importantly, by implicating
all the hierarchical positions of the office together, it solidifies
the authority chain in the office, it makes the points in the chain
visible as it passes through, and rather than serving at the opening
between the public and the private sphere, it is first and foremost
totally a private, official thing. But what is the private office, or, what is the difference between the private office and the public sphere? The difference is created by one other document, it is the document known as the contract.
No comments:
Post a Comment